Chandra X-ray Observatory
NASA/CXC & J. Vaughan
On 23 July 1999, simply months earlier than I began college, NASA’s house shuttle Columbia launched with valuable cargo on board. Not solely was it carrying the primary crew to be led by a lady, Eileen Collins, however its main objective was to launch a brand new flagship house telescope, the Chandra X-ray Observatory. Chandra was the heaviest payload that NASA’s house shuttles ever carried, and it turned out to be one of many final two accomplished missions by Columbia earlier than it tragically exploded after launch on 1 February 2003.
Chandra was the primary, and up to now solely, NASA mission named for an individual of color, the late theoretical astrophysicist and Nobel laureate Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, identified to his family and friends as Chandra. Chandrasekhar, whose household identify means “moon crown”, made many vital contributions to astrophysics. His most vital was determining the Chandrasekhar restrict, the utmost mass a white dwarf stellar remnant will be earlier than it collapses and kinds a black gap.
It’s acceptable to call an X-ray telescope mission after a scientist who spent his life excited about the physics of black holes, as a result of X-ray telescopes play a key function in black gap analysis. X-rays are high-energy gentle waves. This implies they’re produced in extraordinarily energetic environments just like the areas round black holes, the place the sturdy gravitational pull as a result of space-time’s excessive distortion causes particles to speed up to very excessive speeds. In different phrases, we see an entire different universe once we have a look at it by means of the lens of X-ray astronomy slightly than the seen wavelengths of extra conventional telescopes.
Importantly, X-ray astronomy can’t be performed from Earth’s floor as a result of our environment blocks X-rays. That’s good for human well being, however not so nice for astronomers. Thus, Chandra serves as a reminder of how vital it’s to maintain low Earth orbit freed from particles: we’d like to have the ability to safely launch house telescopes that do work we merely can’t handle from the bottom.
I really feel that I’ve grown up with Chandra, and never simply because attending college at Chandra headquarters, now generally known as the Heart for Astrophysics (CfA) in Massachusetts, meant being mistakenly referred to as “Chandra” rather a lot. One in every of my undergraduate lab initiatives was calibrating the light-collecting a part of a back-up digicam for Chandra. The next 12 months, I wrote my undergraduate thesis below the supervision of X-ray astronomy skilled Martin Elvis. My analysis targeted on winds of particles that fly out of galaxies which are house to supermassive black holes. I used Chandra information to analyse what construction these galaxies may take. I do know for a proven fact that Martin’s letter secured my admission into a minimum of one PhD programme. In different phrases, with out Chandra, my profession may by no means have launched.
I’m considered one of hundreds of scientists throughout physics and astronomy who can inform an identical story about how Chandra information has offered the inspiration for his or her early profession steps, or who’ve devoted their lives to exploring cosmic mysteries utilizing Chandra. Laura Lopez at The Ohio State College has lengthy used Chandra to analysis supernovae. Daniel Castro, now a employees scientist on the CfA, does the identical. The three of us have been all postdoctoral researchers collectively on the Massachusetts Institute of Know-how, a part of a era raised on the ability of the Chandra X-ray Observatory.
Right this moment, after 25 years in orbit, Chandra is below risk – not from house particles or the realities of ageing tools, however as an alternative from political winds. US President Joe Biden’s political appointees on the head of NASA not too long ago sought to wind down the challenge, however the scientific group has labored with Congress to avoid wasting the mission. However issues received’t be the identical. The compromise, but to be signed into legislation, entails considerably defunding and limiting the scientific attain of Chandra. There isn’t a scientific argument for doing this, particularly in opposition to the suggestions {of professional} advisors. Even so, NASA has lower grants that have been already promised to scientists, leaving PhD college students and postdoctoral researchers with out anticipated funding that covers the salaries they stay on.
Chandra deserves higher, and so does its world viewers. Because of Chandra, now we have found new neutron stars and realized about their interiors. Our information of black holes has blossomed. We higher perceive the stellar life cycle and the historical past of our galaxy. We’ve got been capable of situate the Milky Method in context, learning galaxy clusters and studying about how darkish matter is distributed in them. There may be nonetheless time to avoid wasting Chandra, which is a monument to human ingenuity. The very fact it’s nonetheless going sturdy after 25 years ought to be celebrated, and honoured by persevering with the mission.
Chanda’s week
What I’m studying
A buddy gave me a duplicate of Andreea Kindryd’s From Slavery to the Stars: A private journey, and it’s lovely.
What I’m watching
I’ve been watching traditional episodes of Star Trek: The Subsequent Technology like “Remember Me”.
What I’m engaged on
I’m creating a brand new course that can put together college students to know science in social context.
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein is an affiliate professor of physics and astronomy, and a core school member in ladies’s research on the College of New Hampshire. Her most up-to-date e-book is The Disordered Cosmos: A journey into darkish matter, spacetime, and desires deferred
Subjects:
