Nowcasting Wisconsin GDP | Econbrowser

Date:

Share post:

Suppose it’s the top of August, and one need to get the most effective estimate of Wisconsin actual GDP for Q2. As of August, solely Q1 Wisconsin GDP is accessible. What’s the most effective guess of of Q2 GDP, retaining in thoughts the variety of month-to-month indicators on the state degree is way decrease than that for the Nation. Right here’s my tentative reply.

Determine 1: Wisconsin GDP (daring black), random stroll with drift forecast (inexperienced), error correction mannequin (crimson), +/- one commonplace error band (grey traces), all in mn.Ch.2017$ SAAR. Supply: BEA, writer’s calculations.

Forecast based mostly upon these information, and this regression:

wideterminants

Determine 2: Wisconsin GDP to US GDP, in logs (blue, left scale), US GDP in log first variations (tan, proper scale), Wisconsin NFP in log first variations  (inexperienced, proper scale), all s.a. 2024Q3 WI NFP commentary is the common for July, August. Supply: BEA, BLS, writer’s calculations.

ΔyWIt= 0.720 + 1.130ΔyUSt0.268(yWIt-1-yUSt-1) + 1.428ΔnWIt

Adj-R2 = 0.78, SER = 0.0036, N=13, DW=1.85, pattern 2021Q1-2024Q1. Daring face signifies statistical significance at 10% msl, utilizing Newey-West commonplace errors.

13 observations looks like a slender thread to hold a nowcast upon. Sadly, this specification fails fully for the total pattern of accessible information (2005Q1-2024Q1, the place I’ve spliced the actual GDP sequence in Ch.2012$ and Ch.2017$). Pre-pandemic, the error correction phrases has a optimistic signal; that is true, no matter whether or not the pandemic recession and speedy aftermath (2020Q1-2020Q4) is omitted or not. Relatively, a single regressor dominates (US GDP progress). Right here’s a comparability:

comparenowcasts

Determine 3: Wisconsin GDP (daring black), full-sample US GDP based mostly (mild blue), error correction mannequin (crimson), Wisconsin DoR Financial Outlook forecast (chartreuse), all in mn.Ch.2017$ SAAR. Supply: BEA, DoR, writer’s calculations.

Whereas the distinction between the 2 nowcasts appears small, the implied distinction in q/q annualized progress charges is noticeable: 2.1% vs. 1.9%.

The discharge of Wisconsin GDP is slated for tomorrow.

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles

How local weather danger will complicate central bankers’ jobs

Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dimeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on...

EU nations set to greenlight tariffs on Chinese language electrical autos

This text is an on-site model of our Europe Specific e-newsletter. Premium subscribers can enroll right here to...

Israel strikes southern Beirut as oil costs surge

This text is an on-site model of our FirstFT e-newsletter. Subscribers can signal as much as our Asia,...

Nowcasting Non-public NFP utilizing ADP Information

My guess for personal NFP: Determine 1: Non-public NFP (daring black), nowcast (blue), +/- 1 std error band (grey),...