Every as soon as in a terrific whereas paleontological fieldwork turns up a fossil so extraordinary that it revolutionizes our understanding of the origin and evolution of a whole department of the tree of life. Fifty years in the past one among us (Johanson) made simply such a discovery on an expedition to the Afar area of Ethiopia. On November 24, 1974, Johanson was out prospecting for fossils of human ancestors along with his graduate scholar Tom Grey, eyes educated on the bottom, when he noticed a chunk of elbow with humanlike anatomy. Glancing upslope, he noticed further fragments of bone glinting within the noonday solar. Within the weeks, months and years that adopted, because the expedition staff labored to recuperate and analyze all the traditional bones eroding out of that hillside, it turned clear that Johanson had discovered a exceptional partial skeleton of a human ancestor who had lived some 3.2 million years in the past. She was assigned to a brand new species, Australopithecus afarensis, and given the reference quantity A.L.288-1, which stands for “Afar locality 288,” the spot the place she, the primary hominin fossil, was discovered. However to most individuals, she is understood just by her nickname, Lucy. With the invention of Lucy, scientists have been compelled to rethink key particulars of the human story, from when and the place humanity acquired its begin to how the assorted extinct members of the human household have been associated to at least one one other—and to us. Her mixture of apelike and humanlike traits instructed her species occupied a key place within the household tree: ancestral to all later human species, together with members of our genus, Homo.
It may be precarious to hold such a pivotal argument on a single fossil particular person. However within the half a century since Lucy’s unveiling, many extra specimens of Au. afarensis have been discovered. Collectively they supply an exceptionally detailed document of this historical species, revealing the place it roamed, the way it lived, how its members differed from each other and the way lengthy it endured earlier than going extinct.
In 1972 researchers traveled to the Afar area of northeastern Ethiopia to search for hominin fossils courting to greater than three million years in the past. A website referred to as Hadar seemed particularly promising, its rugged panorama chock-full of mammal fossils that erode out of the hillsides over time.
On supporting science journalism
Should you’re having fun with this text, contemplate supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By buying a subscription you might be serving to to make sure the way forward for impactful tales concerning the discoveries and concepts shaping our world at this time.
Now we have additionally realized so much about Lucy’s personal predecessors—and her contemporaries. Some of the thrilling developments within the discipline of human origins analysis because the discovery of Lucy has been the revelation that for many of our prehistory a number of human species, or hominins, roamed the planet. One among us (Haile-Selassie) has discovered hominins that overlapped in time and area with Lucy’s form. These members of the human household are fascinating in their very own proper. Additionally they present important context for understanding the evolution of the species which will very effectively have given rise to us all.
To perceive why Lucy had such an enormous affect on paleoanthropology, we now have to have a look at the state of the science on the time of her discovery. Again within the early Nineteen Seventies, the oldest hominin fossils on document have been considered round 2.5 million years previous and belonged to a species referred to as Australopithecus africanus from South Africa. Youthful fossils fell into one among two teams: the so-called sturdy australopiths, with their big molars and highly effective jaws, and the extra delicately constructed, or “gracile,” varieties, which included Homo. Though Au. africanus was labeled as gracile, it didn’t notably resemble both of those later teams. But it was the one sufficiently well-documented hominin we had that was sufficiently old to be ancestral to them. There have been a couple of scraps of fossil materials from jap Africa that have been older, however there wasn’t sufficient materials preserved to get an excellent sense of the sorts of creatures they got here from. And so scientists drew their evolutionary bushes with Au. africanus because the all-important ancestor of Homo and the sturdy varieties. However what they actually wanted to check that speculation about Au. africanus have been extra full fossils in extra of three million years previous.
Within the spring of 1972 Johanson journeyed to Ethiopia with French geologist Maurice Taieb in quest of hominin fossils from past the three-million-year mark. Taieb was eager to take him to the Afar area of northeastern Ethiopia, the place he had beforehand seen pig and elephant fossils that appeared to be from the time interval Johanson was focusing on. Maybe hominin fossils have been there, too, ready to be found. Surveying a bunch of fossil-bearing areas within the area, the staff zeroed in on a website referred to as Hadar. Brimming with fossils of rodents, elephants, rhinos, hippos, monkeys, horses, antelopes and carnivores, Hadar should have been a bountiful atmosphere thousands and thousands of years in the past to assist so many animals. It appeared like a promising space to seek for historical human ancestors. Johanson knew that if hominin fossils have been discovered there, they may upend our understanding of how people got here to be.
On November 24, 1974, Donald C. Johanson found the practically 3.2-million-year-old Lucy skeleton on one of many hillsides. A stake marks the spot the place the fossil was discovered.
When the expedition staff returned to Hadar the next yr, Johanson made a tantalizing discovery: a knee joint estimated to be 3.4 million years previous. Anatomical particulars of the knee indicated that it had come from a hominin that walked upright, like us, confirming the fossil hunters’ hunch that Hadar had hominins. Johanson suspected the knee belonged to an Australopithecus particular person, however with out extra anatomical info to go on, he couldn’t decide whether or not it got here from Au. africanus or a brand new species. What the staff wanted most was to search out stays of skulls and tooth, the physique components that comprise essentially the most diagnostic options for distinguishing species in fossil mammals. The researchers might solely hope that the following discipline season would flip up cranial and dental specimens.
Their dream got here spectacularly true on that momentous day in 1974. The Lucy fossil preserved cranium fragments and a decrease jaw with tooth, in addition to components of the arm, leg, pelvis, backbone and ribs—47 bones in all representing a whopping 40 p.c of the skeleton of a single particular person. Her stays promised untold insights into the human previous.
Named after the Beatles tune “Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds,” which performed on the tape deck at camp because the staff celebrated, Lucy turned an instantaneous sensation. Nothing like her had ever been discovered earlier than. She was diminutive—her 12-inch-long thigh bone indicated that she stood solely three and a half ft tall and weighed 60 to 65 kilos. Like many different animals, early hominins exhibit a situation referred to as sexual dimorphism, whereby males are a lot bigger than females, amongst different morphological variations. Lucy was too small to be a male. And her erupted knowledge tooth and lack of unfused progress plates in her limb bones confirmed she was an grownup.
The expedition camped alongside the banks of the Awash River and started a focused search of the world’s fossil-bearing sediments.
Different options attested to how she carried herself. After intently inspecting her knee, hip and ankle, in addition to conducting intensive biomechanical research, Johanson and his colleagues concluded that she walked upright—a trait that Charles Darwin argued was a trademark of people—with a gait very very similar to our personal. Different students interpreted the bones in another way, arguing that she walked along with her knees and hips bent like chimpanzees do after they often journey on two legs. Ultimate decision of this debate got here in 1978, after researchers found a shocking path of hominin footprints impressed in 3.7-million-year-old volcanic ash on the website of Laetoli in Tanzania. Among the prints are so detailed that each one the traits of a contemporary human footprint left on a seashore are seen. They confirmed that the Laetoli monitor makers walked like us, not like chimpanzees. And since hominin tooth and jaws much like these from Hadar had been discovered at Laetoli, it stood to purpose that Lucy’s form left the prints.
Traits corresponding to a receding chin, strongly projecting snout, low and sloping brow, and really small mind measurement positioned Lucy within the genus Australopithecus. However sure features of her anatomy hinted that she may be extra primitive than different recognized species in that group. Her first decrease premolar was oval in form and had a single cusp, like an ape’s. Likewise, her decrease limbs have been comparatively quick, presumably an evolutionary characteristic left over from her ancestors who lived a extra arboreal life. Though solely bits of her braincase have been recovered, the fragments instructed a mind quantity of 388 cubic centimeters. That’s very small in contrast with the trendy human mind, which averages 1,400 cubic centimeters, and akin to the typical fashionable chimp mind. Lucy confirmed earlier suspicions that upright strolling advanced earlier than giant brains.
With so many components of her skeleton preserved, Lucy was a trove of knowledge. However she was nonetheless only one particular person. For a deeper understanding of her species, we would have liked extra specimens. To that finish, continued fieldwork at Hadar and different websites within the area has yielded a wealth of further Au. afarensis fossils that collectively present an in depth portrait of this ancestor.
In 1975, only one yr after Lucy was discovered at Afar Locality 288, the Hadar staff found greater than 200 fossil hominin specimens eroding from a single layer of rock at close by Afar Locality 333. Dated to slightly greater than 3.2 million years in the past, the pattern consisted of female and male adults in addition to parts of infants and juveniles estimated to characterize a minimum of 17 people, all presumably associated. The group turned often called the “First Family.”
When Lucy was found 50 years in the past, she was the oldest, most full early member of the human household that had ever been discovered, with 47 bones representing 40 p.c of the skeleton. Options of her hip, knee and ankle point out that she walked upright on two legs like we do. But in different respects she was primitive, with a mind lower than a 3rd of the dimensions of our personal.
Combining the expanded Hadar assortment with Lucy’s Tanzanian counterparts allowed the staff to reconstruct the cranium of the hominin species discovered at Hadar and to guage the fossils’ taxonomic standing and place on the human household tree. In 1978, following an intensive comparative examine of all of the australopith species then recognized, Johanson and his colleagues concluded that though among the dental and cranial options evident in these stays are present in different members of Australopithecus, the overall morphological bundle seen within the Hadar and Laetoli fossils was distinctive and constituted a species new to science: Australopithecus afarensis. Moreover, they proposed, Au. afarensis occupied a outstanding place on the household tree, changing Au. africanus because the final widespread ancestor of later hominins, together with Homo and the sturdy australopiths.
Not everybody within the paleoanthropological neighborhood embraced the naming of this new species. Detractors argued that the hominin document between two million and three million years in the past was too sparse to assist the declare that Au. afarensis was the ancestor of later hominins. The invention of extra fossils from this time interval can be essential for testing this speculation.
In 1975 Johanson, proven right here with graduate scholar Tom Grey, found fossils from a gaggle of hominins—dubbed the First Household—who had died collectively at one other locality in Hadar and belonged to the identical species as Lucy.
That further proof has since are available in. In 1985 researchers working in northern Kenya found a 2.5-million-year-old skull of the sturdy australopith Paranthropus aethiopicus. Dubbed the “Black Skull” for its manganese-tinged coloration, it possessed a robust masticatory system, together with giant crushing and grinding tooth, much like these of a sturdy australopith particular person typically known as “Nutcracker Man,” who lived 1.8 million years in the past and belonged to the species Paranthropus boisei. The Black Cranium additionally shared a number of traits with Au. afarensis, together with a particularly projecting decrease face. When the three species are thought of collectively, Au. afarensis is a compelling ancestor for P. aethiopicus, which in flip seems ancestral to P. boisei.
Additional assist for the speculation that Au. afarensis gave rise to later australopiths in jap Africa got here in 1990, when a skull the identical age because the Black Cranium surfaced in Ethiopia’s Center Awash Valley. The invention staff deemed it a brand new species, Australopithecus garhi, and claimed that it occurred on the proper time and place to be ancestral to Homo. Just like the sturdy australopiths, this specimen had a formidable masticatory system, with massive jaws and a crest atop its head that might have anchored robust chewing muscle groups. It additionally had a facial construction much like that of Au. afarensis. Different scientists have surmised that Au. garhi descended from Au. afarensis and advanced its formidable chewing anatomy in parallel with the sturdy australopiths however didn’t itself give rise to later hominin species.
Cranial and dental stays from this discover allowed researchers to reconstruct the cranium of that species, Australopithecus afarensis.
Different fossil finds bolstered the proposed hyperlink between Au. afarensis and Homo. For a very long time the oldest recognized fossils within the genus Homo dated solely way back to round two million years in the past, leaving a worrying hole of greater than one million years between the youngest Au. afarensis and the oldest Homo. In 1994 researchers at Hadar discovered a 2.33-million-year-old palate—the bone that makes up the roof of the mouth—that shared morphological traits with Homo habilis, “Handy Man,” the earliest recognized member of our genus, narrowing that temporal hole by a couple of hundred thousand years. And in 2013 a staff working at a website northeast of Hadar referred to as Ledi-Geraru recovered the left half of a 2.8-million-year-old mandible bearing a mixture of primitive Au. afarensis options and traits of early Homo. The Ledi-Geraru jaw offered one other stepping stone between Au. afarensis and Homo and strengthened the morphological connection between them as effectively, serving to to validate the speculation that Au. afarensis is one of the best candidate we now have for the ancestor of our personal genus.
Human fossils are usually uncommon, which implies that our understanding of the previous can change dramatically when new specimens floor. When Au. afarensis was named as a brand new species in 1978, it was the earliest human ancestor ever documented, with an age vary of three.8 million to three.0 million years in the past. Fossils recovered within the mid-Nineteen Nineties prolonged the early hominin document again even farther. In 1994 researchers working within the Center Awash area of Ethiopia’s Afar Rift discovered hominin fossils dated to 4.4 million years in the past. They assigned the stays to a brand new species, Ardipithecus ramidus. The next yr one other new species was named based mostly on fossil discoveries from Kanapoi and Allia Bay in Kenya’s Turkana Basin: Australopithecus anamensis, which lived from 4.3 million to three.8 million years in the past. With the naming of those two species, Au. afarensis misplaced the excellence of being the oldest hominin, nevertheless it gained an origin story of its personal: Au. anamensis is believed to be the direct ancestor of Au. afarensis. Extra not too long ago, discoveries in Chad, Kenya and Ethiopia have pushed the origin of humankind again so far as seven million years.
Different fossil finds have proven that Au. afarensis was not the one hominin species round throughout its lengthy reign, elevating the query of whether or not Au. afarensis or one among these different hominins is the ancestor of Homo and Paranthropus. Removed from diminishing the importance of Lucy’s species, these findings enrich its story: we now have many extra puzzle items from which to reconstruct the evolution of the road that led to us and the components that formed it alongside the best way. The image that’s rising from this work is way extra advanced—and engaging—than the one paleoanthropologists historically envisioned.
Previous to 1960, human origins researchers thought that solely a single hominin species lived at any given time prior to now. This notion stemmed from the concept that competitors prohibits the coexistence of associated species with comparable variations, a precept often called aggressive exclusion. The fossil document of hominins appeared to assist this idea till fossils of two totally different hominin species have been recovered from the identical geological layer at websites in Kenya and Tanzania. Nonetheless, there was no proof that one other species lived alongside Au. afarensis, and due to that, it was thought of to be the ancestor of all later hominins.
Finally, nevertheless, challengers turned up from varied websites in jap and central Africa. In 1995 a staff lead by paleontologist Michel Brunet found a 3.5-million-year-old partial hominin jaw from a website in northern Chad often called Koro-Toro and assigned it to a brand new species, Australopithecus bahrelghazali. This fossil was vital not solely as a result of it was discovered outdoors the East African Rift System, the place nearly all early hominins have been recovered, but additionally as a result of it overlapped in time with Au. afarensis. Not everybody agreed that the jaw was distinctive sufficient to characterize a brand new species. However, it was the primary trace that Au. afarensis could not have been the one hominin species round 3.5 million years in the past.
A second trace got here in 2001, when paleontologist Meave Leakey and her staff introduced their discovery of a 3.5-million-year-old skull from Lomekwi, a website in northwest Kenya, and assigned it to a brand new genus and species referred to as Kenyanthropus platyops, partly on the premise of what they noticed as a particular flatness of its face. Critics additionally challenged the validity of this species, arguing that the badly crushed cranium was too distorted for its true form to be discernible. Regardless, it was one other indication that Au. afarensis won’t have been alone—even in jap Africa.
For the previous 20 years Yohannes Haile-Selassie has been working at a fossil website some 40 kilometers north of Hadar referred to as Woranso-Mille. There he has recovered fossils belonging to contemporaries of Au. afarensis, together with jawbones belonging to a species referred to as Australopithecus deyiremeda and afoot belonging to a but unidentified species that had a diver gent massive toe like an ape’s.
Cleveland Museum of Pure Historical past
Extra not too long ago, Haile-Selassie has discovered the strongest proof but that Au. afarensis had firm. Twenty years in the past he got down to search for new paleontological websites within the Afar Rift containing hominin fossils between three million and 4 million years previous. His efforts resulted within the discovery of a spectacular new website referred to as Woranso-Mille simply 40 kilometers north of Hadar. With fossils spanning the time from 3.8 million to three.0 million years in the past, it has change into probably the most essential websites in all of Africa for hominins from the Pliocene epoch.
Maybe essentially the most exceptional side of Woranso-Mille is the range of hominins discovered there. The positioning has yielded stays of each Au. anamensis (together with a practically full cranium that has given us our first have a look at the face of this ancestor) and its descendant, Au. afarensis. It has additionally produced different hominins. In 2012 Haile-Selassie and his colleagues introduced their discovery of an enigmatic hominin foot with a divergent massive toe extra like an ape’s. At 3.4 million years previous, it was contemporaneous with Au. afarensis. But it clearly didn’t come from that species, whose massive toe lined up with the opposite digits, like ours does. With none related cranium or tooth stays to information them, the researchers didn’t wish to assign the foot to a species. Nevertheless it confirmed past any doubt that Lucy’s species shared the panorama with a essentially totally different type of hominin.
Additional proof that Au. afarensis overlapped with different hominins got here in 2015, when Haile-Selassie and his colleagues introduced their discovery of fossilized higher and decrease jaws from a species new to science, Australopithecus deyiremeda. Dated to three.3 million to three.5 million years in the past, this species was contemporaneous with each Au. afarensis and the proprietor of the mysterious foot that was recovered from the identical website. Whether or not the foot belongs to Au. deyiremeda, given the proximity of the finds, stays to be seen.
A foot belonging to a but unidentified species that had a divergent massive toe like an ape’s.
Cleveland Museum of Pure Historical past
The discoveries at Woranso-Mille present that Au. afarensis didn’t simply share the identical continent and even the identical facet of the continent with different hominin species however lived just about facet by facet with them. They could have been ready to do that by exploiting totally different ecological niches inside the identical space. The species with the divergent massive toe most likely might have climbed bushes extra effectively than Au. afarensis, for instance, and so might need centered on arboreal sources whereas Au. afarensis favored terrestrial ones.
Comparability of the paleoenvironments on the websites the place these fossils are discovered could present additional clues. Hadar and Woranso-Mille are comparable in having hosted each Au. afarensis and different nonhominin mammals concurrently. However solely Woranso-Mille had multiple hominin species. Why have been there a number of contemporaneous hominin species at Woranso-Mille and never at close by Hadar? One speculation we’re testing is that Woranso-Mille encompassed a better variety of habitats, which might have supported a number of hominins with out substantial direct competitors.
Jawbones belonging to a species referred to as Australopithecus deyiremeda.
Cleveland Museum of Pure Historical past
The realization that Au. afarensis might need had as many as three different hominin contemporaries has raised questions concerning the declare that it was the ancestor of all later hominins, together with members of Homo. Now we have to think about whether or not any of those different species could also be a greater candidate ancestor than Au. afarensis. In observe, it’s arduous to attach the dots with certainty. One massive drawback is that the pattern sizes of those different species are too small to permit for significant comparisons. For instance, researchers have argued that Ok. platyops had a flat face like early Homo and will thus be thought of the ancestor of that genus. However we now have just one cranium of Ok. platyops to go on, and it’s badly crushed. Did this creature even have a flat face, or did its poor preservation distort its true options? We would want well-preserved skulls of this species to know. What’s extra, Ok. platyops is separated from its proposed descendant, Homo rudolfensis, by about one million years, making it troublesome to hyperlink the 2. If we had extra fossils of Ok. platyops from totally different time intervals to ascertain how lengthy this species endured, we’d be capable of bridge that hole, however we don’t.
We merely don’t have sufficient details about Ok. platyops or the opposite Au. afarensis contemporaries to know what sorts of creatures they have been and the way they’re associated to the remainder of the human household. That leaves Au. afarensis—represented by tons of of fossils from quite a few people, juvenile and grownup, spanning some 800,000 years—as one of the best candidate ancestor of Homo and Paranthropus. As further fossils of those extra not too long ago recognized hominins come to gentle, maybe one among them may emerge because the front-runner. Till then, Au. afarensis stays the most probably ancestor and probably the most essential species in human evolutionary historical past.
